urname

They released the AirPods at the same time as the iPhone 7. So not sure where the "too soon" comes from. And also you could still plug in any pair of headphones via the lightning port.

Apple is typically the only company that has to clout and stability of business to push these changes faster. So they take the first hit to make some unpopular, but necessary changes. They make them to force/give space to the rest of the industry to change too. That’s a valuable, if unappreciated, position they fill.

Thank you for the last portion explaining how they’ll fix the cable. This is the kind of information in an article that makes The Verge valuable as a tech blog and one of my favourites.

Thank you thank you

And so continue the great march of consolation. We should be just as concerned about this acquisition as we should have been for Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp.

Big companies with this much capital should be incentivized to build their own teams and expertise instead of acquiring other already incredibly large companies. This is the opposite of competition.

That’s not entirely true.

On macOS for example, Safari receives it’s own standalone updates.

And like you alluded to, on iOS/iPadOS, Apple can just push a 0.0x OS update just for this Safari bug if they wanted to. And it also has an auto updater that by default is "ON" – which means the majority of users will get it overnight.

They all probably would if they had the next big thing out. But for now, they need the annual hype train to keep the gravy coming.

Yes and no. Can those things happen? Yes. How often? Far less often than regular roads.

I believe "Not being able to recognize" is different than "Can not recognize". Tesla is probably not saying that those limitations will always completely cripple the system, but rather they are things that can cause issues.

Highways. (Or interstates, if you’re American)

Amazon didn’t make a profit because it kept reinvesting all gains into further development, as a strategy. Has Turo provided information to support this? I’m surprised the article doesn’t address it.

Lol.

Someone paying $100,000 for a car can still need that car. Can they buy something used for $5,000? Sure. But this is something the person will also have to live with, drive in, transport their kids in – for the foreseeable future, unless they want to constantly be buying and selling cars themselves.

So no, the price of the car does not change the person’s need for it. There are no qualifiers.

Errr the team gets paid either way. Disney+ subscriptions pay for it. I imagine there is calculations within Disney to figure out attribution to content drawing users, and this applies well beyond an initial theatre run, just as you might expect for musicians on Spotify, or same for Netflix shows/movies.

I think we’re all going to have to change our perspective of whether something releases in theaters vs available for home speaks to the quality of the content itself. Things are getting more blurred each day, and just because it’s going direct to streaming doesn’t necessarily mean it’s the same as the "Straight to DVD" days.